Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit landspirit's column >>

LANDSPIRIT

Articles Posted: 52  Links Seeded: 24
Member Since: 6/2008  Last Seen: 5/16/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

What would happen if every person in the world were given 250 million dollars tomorrow?

Sun May 23, 2010 6:03 PM EDT
health, money, riches, organic-farming, value-of-life, sustainable-lifestyles
By landspirit
Advertise | AdChoices

Let's say that beginning tomorrow, everyone in the world was given 250,000.00 a day as long as each one worked in their jobs, talents or both to the best of their ability that day? Teachers would get their 250 million for every day they successfuly taught students and developed each student's talents and promoted the self esteem of each student. For every job doing the best one could provided the 250 million dollar a day reward. Maybe the 250 million would be given from then on at the end of each month. Money only came when work was completed and all had work to complete and a value to give to society. Everyone would have all the money they needed to have a good home (energy/green to the hilt), food could be grown only organically to produce the healthiest food for all to buy, demand for goods would skyrocket but the anti- pollution technology would be required before the head honcho received any of his money for his job would be to make sure production was as safe and sustaining to the environment as technology was able to do. Research would blossom as money would be delivered at the end of each month only to those researchers who did excellent jobs and worked to make technology and the environment compatible As a help, population growth was reduced to below replacelament until human populations reached an equilibrium with the environment and the resources available to sustain them. No one ever would not be able to pay for health care, food, housing, recreation, travelling, etc. The best of everything would be produced because that was the job required to get all your money at the end of the month. Disease, poverty, crime, starvation, despair, violence, and killing would all begin to cease as the instigator (money or desperate need for money) would disappear. Cost of materials, food, etc would not rise and the 250 million bought everything you needed, provided the opportunities to explore the world, enjoy life and your children and develop your mind to the utmost.

At first illnesses would be rampant as the effects of past stresses upon people, including financial and poor nutrition still lingered. As time went on, the general health of people world wide would increase and the need for those ill to be cared for begin to wan. Environmental health would skyrocket and become a major goal of production to receive your 250 million. Research on diseases and advancements would sky rocket as the tremendous pool of talent once lost, wasted or misused became smaller and smaller. More and more ideas would surface. Our world would become a far different place and life sustaining. Man would leap up to the next step of behavioral evolution by using the crutch of money. And then when we have learned different goals and know a different measure of success we could take the money crutch away. Society would be changed. We will have achieved eliminating the deadly belief in 'money'. And the human species will have survived.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • landspirit's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (36)
stu103

Cost of materials, food, etc would not rise and the 250 million bought everything you needed, provided the opportunities to explore the world, enjoy life and your children and develop your mind to the utmost.

Yes it would. Where would business get the money to pay you? A loaf of bread would cost $1 billion. A can a soda $100 million. A house $100 trillion. It wouldn't matter what was paid to workers. Business would make sure that we had nothing left at the end of the week just like they do now.

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Sun May 23, 2010 7:56 PM EDT
krishna-167929

If everyone in the world were given a large sum of money (and the same amount to each)-- within a year or two, with a few rare exceptions, they would all be back to their relative economic position.

  • 4 votes
Reply#2 - Sun May 23, 2010 11:40 PM EDT
Waydown1942

I would hire myself an ambulance with full paramedic crew and we would all go to a Cinnabun and I would gorge myself until they had to rush me to the emergency room and save me just in the nick of time.

The rest of the money I would split between my wife, family, friends and my church.

  • 3 votes
Reply#3 - Mon May 24, 2010 12:12 AM EDT
Zydor

I'd buy gold, as much as my $250m a day would allow before the economy imploded, then hibernate in the hills for 12 months whilst everything melts down due to the most nutty economic policy for decades, if not centuries.

Then when rampant inflation is at its peak at about the 2 year point, I'd buy as much manufacturing as I could at the knock down price it will be at, the rest would go into Gilts ready for the government inspired plummeting interest rates to kick start the economy and my newly acquired manufacturing outlets.

I'd then say a prayer for stupidity being useful after all, put my feet up, and quietly retire from all this madness :)

Regards
Zy

  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Mon May 24, 2010 2:35 AM EDT
landspirit

Nope, I would beat you out. I would buy acres and acres of land with water and mineral rights. Whatever is left out there-I would buy it. There is only so much land and no way of making more unless we rocket off to destroy another planet.

If everyone could buy everything they wanted or needed, what do you think would bring happiness? If having good healthcare, good water, good food, good shelter was just like breathing air- you could have what you needed for life- what would become valuable to you?

    #4.1 - Wed May 26, 2010 4:41 PM EDT
    There They Go Again

    With altogether too many people, what they want even more than money or possessions is the chance to dominate other people. Like other forms of competition, it is not susceptible to elimination by training. That sort of thing is in the genes of humans. It is part of what makes them human. It is also what placed us at the top of the food chain.

      #4.2 - Thu May 27, 2010 4:40 PM EDT
      Reply
      Auteur 1536

      If I were given $250 million, half would go to the bank, the other half would be used to rent a beautiful apartment in West Hollywood and pay for groceries and some of it would be donated to fund a cure for breast cancer.

        Reply#5 - Mon May 24, 2010 2:51 AM EDT
        landspirit

        That sounds like a good idea. One could live just off the interest. I think we would all go for something we want that we have never had and to go for financial security so that we can pay bills and be able to access what we needed for a healthy life. So invest somehow to keep an income coming and then donate to better off our world and health.

          #5.1 - Wed May 26, 2010 4:47 PM EDT
          Reply
          sgdsgDeleted
          jeanette-1355722

          Why not just everyone do their job and everything is free? If people kept working and could just go into a store and pick out what they need, go to a restaurant and eat free, get sick go to a hospital for free it would be much better than having money.

          • 1 vote
          Reply#7 - Mon May 24, 2010 10:24 AM EDT
          Stumpjumper

          Sort of like Star Trek.

            #7.1 - Mon May 24, 2010 11:20 AM EDT
            Zydor

            Mr Marx would have been proud

            • 2 votes
            #7.2 - Mon May 24, 2010 12:24 PM EDT
            Little Sure Shot

            A barter system does have its merrit.

            • 1 vote
            #7.3 - Mon May 24, 2010 10:21 PM EDT
            landspirit

            A barter system does have its merrit

            Money. We created it. We built a world upon its use. In doing so we became a slave to it. In doing so we completely devalued the earth and ourselves. It is destroying us. How can a system be created that values what is actually worth everything?

              #7.4 - Mon May 24, 2010 11:52 PM EDT
              Reply
              Dog_Blue

              Nothing would change except for significant devaluation of the currency. There has to be a difference in value to stimulate economic principles. Eventually an equilibrium would be achieved and economic activity would resume. Mostly in short order as the needs of goods and services would be an immediate event.

              • 5 votes
              Reply#8 - Mon May 24, 2010 1:04 PM EDT
              landspirit

              Nothing would change except for significant devaluation of the currency. There has to be a difference in value to stimulate economic principles.

              If prices were not allowed to rise with decreased supply and the buying power of each individual remained the same? What would happen then? And we have significant devaluation of currency now. Where does it cap off? We are on a one way road headed for a cliff. Trillions of dollars here. Trillions of dollars there. Massive debt. Massive unrest. Massive unhappiness, pain, violence, starvation. Massive destruction of the earth.

              What kind of economic principles would provide for a sustaining world, renewing resources, limited disease, prosperity and health? Money has become the currency of life while being the currency of our extinction.

                #8.1 - Mon May 24, 2010 11:33 PM EDT
                Reply
                Stumpjumper

                1 of something is valuable. an infinity of something is worth nothing. Too much money and inflation kicks in. Each dollar is worth less, takes more to buy the same thing. Look at I believe Zimbabwe and their 1 billion note!

                • 2 votes
                Reply#9 - Mon May 24, 2010 3:19 PM EDT
                There They Go Again

                Yes, you would have the million dollar hamburger, which is OK as long as we don't run out of hamburger. Essentially money would be worthless, it's been going in that direction ever since we went off the gold standard and went onto the government honor standard.

                • 3 votes
                #9.1 - Mon May 24, 2010 3:43 PM EDT
                landspirit

                Essentially money would be worthless, it's been going in that direction ever since we went off the gold standard and went onto the government honor standard.

                Exactly. Right now the price of something increases every year. Things are 25 x more costly than 50 years ago. In another 50 years, things will be 50 x more costly. In another 50 years things will be 100 times more costly. (not exactly correct statistics- but examples to make a point)

                So we have two choices:1) We can continue as we are now. The amount of money needed to buy the same item will continue to increase and increase to where? Where do we think we are going to go with this? How long can we sustain a world on money as we are now? Money is becoming more and more worthless while our environment is being destroyed, people are starving and dying. We are on a path which cannot be sustained. or 2) we can just give everyone all the money they need, prohibit cost increases, keep equal buying power. Money will become worthless then too with a major difference. No one will starve, no one will lack health care, no one will lack what they need. And we will have no reason any longer to destroy the earth. We will have no more reason for war. We will have no more reason for crime. We will start to value that which is really of value. We will regard, the earth, all life and all human life as extremely valuable. It is the skills of others and the bounty of the earth that keeps us alive. A world based on money cannot be sustained. It destroys itself.

                  #9.2 - Mon May 24, 2010 11:10 PM EDT
                  There They Go Again

                  Sorry, that utopia simply won't work, as the Soviet Union found out the hard way. My point was that money, at least paper money, is already worthless since it has no intrinsic value at all. The value of money is now strictly related to the confidence in the government that issues it. Our government has been inspiring less and less confidence for almost a hundred years, certainly since the Depression. Like any other commodity, money also responds directly to the law of supply and demand. No one has ever found any long term circumstance where that did not apply.

                  prohibit cost increases, keep equal buying power.

                  Completely impossible to accomplish. This just stimulates a black market.

                  No one will starve, no one will lack health care, no one will lack what they need.

                  Then why should they bother doing anything that needs doing? Going to force them? You just brought back war. You can't change human nature, you must work with it. Human nature does not respond to utopianism; it responds to greed and the lust for power. If that means that we are doomed as a species, well, that's the way it goes.

                    #9.3 - Wed May 26, 2010 2:50 AM EDT
                    Zydor

                    We will start to value that which is really of value. We will regard, the earth, all life and all human life as extremely valuable. It is the skills of others and the bounty of the earth that keeps us alive. A world based on money cannot be sustained. It destroys itself.

                    This kind of sentiment has been written ever since the human race became able to scratch legible marks on a cave wall. Its was as Utopian then as it is now.

                    Individuals or groups of individuals create goods and services for others. For that effort they require fair exchange. In order to do that "money" has become the 3rd party unit of exchange. Some will value their goods and services above others, some will believe they are worth more than others do. In the end a 3rd party will exchange the agreed amount of "payment" whether thats money or direct exchange is not too relevant.

                    Any attempt - and many such silly attempts have, over the Ages, been made - to interfere with that basic exchange process, will, ultimately, be met with a club descending on someones skull. You will never force others to value their goods and services in a regulated manner. Human Nature is what it is. Simplistic reasoning, and Utopian thinking that ignore the basic instincts of the human race is living in a dream world.

                    Recent attempts?

                    Soviet Union - Collapsed under the weight of unresourced and undervalued Natural Resources, and Populations demand for fair payment for fair work. Currently transiting through Socialism, and starting many capitalist models, will end up the latter.

                    China - Once their "Father" Mao died, they have galloped, not walked, to the free market capitalist model, a ways to go yet, but its irreversible, and they will dominate the Global economy by the end of the Century.

                    Cuba - Once Castro departed from the scene, moved away from the old quasi - communist model. A little slow in changing, but has started down that road.

                    History is littered with these burst Utopian dreams that do not take into account Human Nature. We are the way we are. Its instinct, and as depressing as that can be in some instances, wishing it away and wishing another set of values to take its place by magic wand waving is not going to happen - ever.

                    • 1 vote
                    #9.4 - Wed May 26, 2010 6:50 AM EDT
                    landspirit

                    There You Go Again

                    Then why should they bother doing anything that needs doing? Going to force them

                    All of your points have strong merit. It is you are thinking of a world still based on money. We teach our children what is important. And the reality is that in a world based on money, survival on money, and you cannot even make enough to exist- you are not free. You are a slave to those who have more money. Money is used as the measure of individual value. It isn't. The value lies within the talents of those around us. I know it sounds off and impossible won't work but that is because one is basing everything upon material wealth and the accumalation of stuff as the desire of life.

                    What I am trying to express too so urgently is that a world based upon money will go extinct. It will go extinct because the money is valued and getting it at any cost to others and the earth itself is valued. The very things we need to truly survive are not being valued. We don't really care. We want money. It is what we need to live. It is what is used to measure success. It is supposed to bring happiness. All that stuff we are told we want is there for only one reason: to make money for someone else. We have to stop this and it is so deeply entrenched in the world and cultures that people cannot even envision it. Happiness is money. Survival is money. I would bet if you asked the wealthiest such as Buffet what is important- they would not say money. They have all the money they need to live. Yet they still work. They still strive forward. Why? The answer is because it is not really the money that brings happiness and fullfillment: it is using your talents, having those talents appreciated and having those around you admire your talents. I think even Aristotle saw that as the true definition of happiness.

                      #9.5 - Wed May 26, 2010 2:31 PM EDT
                      landspirit

                      Zygor

                      History is littered with these burst Utopian dreams that do not take into account Human Nature. We are the way we are. Its instinct, and as depressing as that can be in some instances, wishing it away and wishing another set of values to take its place by magic wand waving is not going to happen - ever.

                      That is what everyone thinks. And you are very right. We have to look at what roles instinctual behaviors play still in human behavior. To ignore them is as you say completely foolish. However, think about it more.

                      All social animals living in populations have altruistic behaviors. Altruism becomes essential. Dominance hierarchies are prevalent also. So there is mixture of the two. Human populations are no different. In human populations we use also learning and culture to channel behavior. Religion is used to channel behavior down wanted paths. Look at monogamy. Biologically man is likely polygamous. Yet we squeeze that instinctual tendency down a monogamous path using religion, laws and social acceptance.

                      The only way I can describe it best is to look as man like a cell. Cells began grouping together for the inherent benefits. More and more groupings began. Specialization began. Interdependence became deeper. Now no cell of an organism can live on its own. It needs all the other cells which provide it with the materials to live. Each cell though is wired with the exact same genetic material as all the other cells. A great deal of altruism on a genetic basis instead of a behavioral basis has to exist for an organism to live.

                      We are no longer individual entities surviving on our own. We have become highly specialized and highly interdependent on everything and everyone else. Money literally has no value, no place and no meaning. If we keep trying to make it so, if we value the talents of one over the talents of another, we create an imbalance. It would be like the fingers wanting all the oxygen and trying to hoard it killing the hand. Or the foot cells telling the hand cells they were worthless and trying to dominate them. Each cell, each tissue, each organ has a role. All the roles are crucial. Without the proper functioning of a tissue or organ the whole body can sicken or die.

                      We are at the brink of a much needed step in behavioral evolution. If we don't make that step up, we will perish. It is not a wild doomsayers prediction. It is common sense. If it is our instinctual behaviors motivating, we have to redirect them. In an organism all the cells cannot be trying to get more than all the other cells. They cannot be trying to kill off all the other cells. An organism would die and all perish if so. Like it or not we have evolved into in essence an organism. If we want to survive, we have to work together, value what is really important and if necessary channel instinctual behavior which evolved in a different world thousands and thousands of years ago. It was adaptive then. It is not now.

                      We teach our children that money is valuable. We teach them that they must work to get it. We can teach them instead that it is their talent and who they are that is valuable. We can teach them to see success as using those talents, challenging those talents and making the world as best a place as possible for existence to continue by valuing it and living without harm. . It is also instinctual I think to want to use your gifts, to feel important and to have the gifts of yourself appreciated. It is not instinctual to appreciate or measure success by money.

                      We can do this. However, we will never do it- unless we let go of money, the need to feel superior or better and begin to value the earth and those around us as priceless. Because they are what is really of value.

                      Millions of people grow up in poverty and caught in poverty cycles. The talents or gifts these people have are completely wasted. We spend billions and billions of dollars trying to deal with the damage to society caused by wasting it. There is more advantage to nurturing, using and appreciating. And the ultimate advantage is not going extinct.

                        #9.6 - Wed May 26, 2010 3:14 PM EDT
                        Zydor

                        You are becoming a little fixated here, the phrase "money cant buy you love" is not exactly new, nor is its meaning. Despite Utopian ideals to the contrary, we need a third party method of valuing effort and giving reward. At present its money, in a thousand years, who knows maybe something different. But it or its equivalent will be around for ever to provide the basis for fair ecchange of inputs from different sources eg try valuing a car and a days house cleaning without a common denominator to level the two out.

                        Its not money that needs tackling, like it or not money or its replacement third party exchange medium will always be there. The key is to educate and inform the real value of goods & services, as well as their place at a personal level, not fixate on paper or a precious metal or whatever fad exists, the exchange method, whilst essential, is only a process, it is not the problem.

                        Its the same as there are no bad car accidents, only lethal drivers.

                        • 1 vote
                        #9.7 - Wed May 26, 2010 3:20 PM EDT
                        landspirit

                        This kind of sentiment has been written ever since the human race became able to scratch legible marks on a cave wall. Its was as Utopian then as it is now.

                        So true. Perhaps it is being introduced over and over because in the end, it is the only system that will ever allow the human species to keep from going extinct. Right now we are spiralling down straight into total oblivion. We are destroying ourselves. To say that we cannot breach the barrier to the needed step up in behavioral evolution, is to say the human as a species is doomed. It is probably true. Because looking at the complete and total mess the world is in and our continued raping and destruction of everything we need to actually survive in order to gain money and more money and have all that stuff that we are told is important so someone else can make money we are headed to disaster sooner I think then people realize.

                        We cannot go on the way we are. It is a system that is destructive and worthless in the long term. We can make the changes we need to., We can look at our instinctual behaviors. We can use that understanding to make a system that will actually be sustaining and healthy. Or we can die.

                          #9.8 - Wed May 26, 2010 3:24 PM EDT
                          Zydor

                          Because looking at the complete and total mess the world is in and our continued raping and destruction of everything we need to actually survive in order to gain money and more money and have all that stuff that we are told is important so someone else can make money we are headed to disaster sooner I think then people realize.

                          You are forgetting to breath in ..... the problem with the eco-meltdown theory (and that's been around for centuries) is there is never any proven foundation for the eco-meltdown, nor any proven so called solution. Usually there is just the sound of whirring propeller heads, and Beethoven's fifth as the description of carnage and the end of mankind is earnestly foretold.

                          The eco-disaster scenarios always predicate on nothing being done, and the Human Race of course does not have the intelligence of the doomsters incisive prediction. The end of oil has been earnestly foretold for most of the latter part of the 20th Century, yet drilling has just started off the Falklands where there are identified oil reserves bigger than all the Middle East put together.

                          Will all problems go away? of course not. Will we run out of natural resource? At some point yes, inevitably. Lets hope we have another Planet to use by then. But money being the root of all economic, personal, governmental and ecological problems to the extent we magically make it all well by abolishing it ..... ?

                          You cant even eliminate money when playing Monopoly and fantasy rules are kind of acceptable - but in the real world? Forget it, never happen.

                            #9.9 - Wed May 26, 2010 3:48 PM EDT
                            landspirit

                            Zydor

                            But money being the root of all economic, personal, governmental and ecological problems to the extent we magically make it all well by abolishing it ..... ?

                            You are right in that it is not the 'money'. Money is paper now or figures recorded in some sort of way. It is ourselves that is the problem. And unfortuntely looking at our world, we seem to have no ability to change ourselves. Or do we? We cannot change our genes yet, but we are certainly headed there. We can channel our behavior. We have been doing that for centuries. Some cultural channelling integrates itself so firmly within cultures that people can be so afraid of not doing it that way, that it takes years and years of education and understanding to change the behavior. Although we definitely still have more instinctual behaviors and tendancies then people especially those trying to deny evolution like to ever admit, we still are a species that has met change in their environment and changed their environment the most by learning and adjusting. So right now we have a world that will overpopulate itself quickly, that is destroying the land, air and water it needs just to survive and it is doing it all to get more of the medium of exchange because that medium of exchange brings more goods and ease of life. And you are very right I think, we won't change it. But I imagine you can see the finale of that route.

                            Most species of animals are limited by their environment in a very delicate and receptive balance. We aren't. And we manipulate things to where even though we are changing our environment and destroying it, we feel muted effects. But that only goes to a certain point. Once you cross a threshold, things begin to fall apart, go haywire and die. We cannot see the big picture. We cannot see that we are a speck of dust in relation to time. So we cannot see what we do. Take a species not endemic to a habitat with no natural enemies but that can survive well and out perform all other species there in getting resources. It does not take too long for the species to overpopulate, use all its resources, destroy its habitat and then die off even become completely extinct. We are like that introduced species. We might feel in control, but we are not. We are actually the ones that will end up extinct. It is just a different time scale. The results though are just reality and common sense. Ecology itself is just common sense. Our role in the world and environment should be just common sense. However like the better at getting food and resources introduced species, we go plundering through feeling quite superior and our populations grow and grow and grow. There is only one end to that unless we change the very fabric of our way of thought and life.

                              #9.10 - Wed May 26, 2010 5:20 PM EDT
                              landspirit

                              out of natural resource? At some point yes, inevitablyWill we run

                              Most of everything goes by thresholds. Things seem to stay exactly the same until a threshold is reached and then kabam. It is too that we are not dependent upon just one resource. Everything is connected. So one thing can reach a threshold and start disaster and then it affects everything else or multiple thresholds can be hit creating something even worse.

                                #9.11 - Wed May 26, 2010 6:25 PM EDT
                                Reply
                                Vintage Viner

                                Interesting thoughts, but...I believe people would be the same way they are now; they would want everybody's millions to add to their own, by hook or by crook. Afterwhile there would be shortages of everything, because the greediest ones whould still own the most of everything. UGH!

                                • 2 votes
                                Reply#10 - Mon May 24, 2010 8:02 PM EDT
                                landspirit

                                because the greediest ones whould still own the most of everything. UGH!

                                So true. However, they could not really be greedy. Everyone can buy what anyone else can. There would be no substitute for money though and nothing could be bought without money. So from month to month everyone has the same buying power. Supplies will start to run out. What would happen then? Still prices would not be allowed to rise and everyone would continue to receive all the money they needed as long as they contributed their job/skill every month as required.

                                  #10.1 - Mon May 24, 2010 10:59 PM EDT
                                  Reply
                                  Little Sure Shot

                                  Someone give me the money and I will let you know.

                                  They who say money can't buy happiness just do not know where to shop.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  Reply#11 - Mon May 24, 2010 10:19 PM EDT
                                  landspirit

                                  just do not know where to shop.

                                  Let me know where you shop. What would happen if every month as long as you did your job that you got another 250 million? What would become important to you? Would anything change for you?

                                    #11.1 - Mon May 24, 2010 10:53 PM EDT
                                    Reply
                                    landspirit

                                    Business would make sure that we had nothing left at the end of the week just like they do now.

                                    That would be true except for one thing. The demand remains high and so does the supply. At least until resources start to run out. Then demand could increase prices. But prices would not be allowed to rise. As such you have the exact same buying power every single month as long as you complete your job successfully. At first I imagine everyone would go bonkers. They could get whatever they want. All that stuff. No worries about bills. No worries about starvation. No worries about housing. No worries about health care. All that would be paid for with your millions of dollars. You just need to do your job.

                                    It is the only way I can think of to wean a society and world off of money. Money does not exist. And in the scheme of things, 'stuff' is worthless if in making or using it one destroys or takes more than they give back. Our problem is that 'money' is needed for everything. Without 'money' one cannot live. Without the ability to hoarde money or buy more than joe, what would become important?

                                    Money is printed off without backing already. It is just numbers on paper. It does not exist. Print off enough to give everyone 250 million dollars. Print off enough to give everyone 250 million dollars every month thereafter if their job is done, if their talent, skills ability are used to the benefit of everyone and done to the best of their ability. Money is not the motivator for life we are born with. We create the artificial measure of success. We create the desire to own and have stuff. We create the situations that money brings power. What happens if we don't do any of that?

                                    And the reality is that every year, money buys less and less. Today it takes 4.00 to buy a loaf of bread that cost 5 cents 100 years ago. Another 100 years it will take thousands of dollars to buy a loaf of bread. That is just going to keep happening and happening. It shows the reality: money has no value and is meaningless. So get rid of it.

                                      Reply#12 - Mon May 24, 2010 10:47 PM EDT
                                      Waydown1942

                                      Would anyone like to have $499,750,000.00???

                                      Just send me a certified cashier's check for $250,000.00 and in front of all these witnesses I give you all my rights to my $250,000,000.00.

                                      Is that a bargain or what? : )

                                      • 1 vote
                                      Reply#13 - Tue May 25, 2010 12:06 AM EDT
                                      landspirit

                                      Human nature already. And it has not even happened yet. :) :)

                                        #13.1 - Wed May 26, 2010 5:31 PM EDT
                                        Reply
                                        krishna-167929

                                        Here are a few suggestions as to how to spend it: Those things Money Can Buy (photos & descriptions)

                                        Money can't buy you happiness, but it can buy you a lot of fun toys

                                        • 1 vote
                                        Reply#14 - Tue May 25, 2010 1:13 AM EDT
                                        landspirit

                                        Here are a few suggestions as to how to spend it

                                        Thanks for that link. Trumps place looked interesting. Still I would likely buy land- and then keep it as pristine and safe as possible. Personally land to me is where I live. A house is the place to be when for whatever reason i cannot be outside. It would too be one of the only things really worth anything in the long run and there is only so much of it. If one thinks about it, about the only thing that a person needs to exist right now that does not require money to buy is air. How long I wonder before air is marketed and I guess if you are too poor to buy enough of it you suffocate and die?

                                          Reply#15 - Wed May 26, 2010 3:56 PM EDT
                                          Leave a Comment:
                                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                          You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                          (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                          Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                          FUN STUFF:
                                          • Leaderboard |
                                          • E-Mail Alerts |
                                          • Top of the Vine |
                                          • Newsvine Live |
                                          • Newsvine Archives |
                                          • The Greenhouse |
                                          COMPANY STUFF:
                                          • Code of Honor |
                                          • Company Info |
                                          • Contact Us |
                                          • Jobs |
                                          • User Agreement |
                                          • Privacy Policy |
                                          • About our ads
                                          LEGAL STUFF:
                                          • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                          • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                          • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com